Effect of Social Facilitation on Classroom Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53449/ije.v1i1.33Keywords:
social facilitation, classroom performance, formative and summative evaluationAbstract
This study examined the effect of social facilitation on the performance of teachers and students in Lagos state secondary schools. One hundred and twenty six teachers and three hundred and seventy students formed sample for the study. The instrument used for the study was the Teachers’ and Students’ Performance Scale (TSPS). TSPS was used to assess the performance of teachers and students in the classroom. Two hypotheses were tested. Results showed statistically significant effect of social facilitation and audience effect on classroom performance (t, -7.895= p 0.000 < 0.05. and t, -13.001= p 0.000 < 0.05), which was attributed to the type of presence and the kind of consequence associated to the presence.
Downloads
References
Aiello, J. R., & Douthitt, E. A. (2001). Social facilitation from the triplett to electronic performance monitoring Group Dynamic: Theory, Research and Practice, 5(3), 163- 180.
Aiello, J. R., & Svev, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work performance: Extending the social facilitation frame work to electronic presence [Special issue: Computer monitoring] Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(7), 537-548.
Black, Paul & William, Dylan. (1998). “Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment”. Phi Delta Kappan. 80(2), 139-148.
Bryan, J., Holcomb-McCoy, C., Moore-Thomas, C, & Day-Vines, N. L. (2009). Who sees the school counsellor for college information? A national study. Professional School Counseling 12, 280-291.
Dindo, M., Whiten, A., & de Waal, F.B.M. (2009). Social facilitation of exploratory foraging behaviour in capuchin monkeys (cebus apella). American Journal of Primatology, 71(5), 419-426.
Duke, D. & Stiggins, R. J. (1990). Beyond minimum competence: Evaluation for professional development. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers. Newbury Park: Sage.
Gao, L. (2002). English language testing and assessment. Beijing: People’s Education Press.
Gold, R. (2001). Evaluation of instruction. Educational Studies, 15(1), 31-42.
Huguet, P., Galvaing, M.P., & Monteil, J.M., Dumas, F., (1999) Social presence effects in the Stroop task: further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1011-25.
Kirby, L. (2011). Group processes. Lecture presented to social psychology course at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Stanton, J. M., & Barness-Farrell, J. L. (1996). Effects of electronic performance control monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 738-745
Strauss, B. (2001). Social facilitation in motor tasks: a review of research and theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 3, 237-256.
Stronge, J. H. (1997). Improving schools through teacher evaluation. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Thompson, L.F.T., Sebastienelli, J.D.S., & Murray, N.P.M. (2009). Monitoring online training behaviours: awareness of electronic surveillance hinders e-learners. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2191–2212.
Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., & Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Brooklyn: The New Teacher Project. Retrieved from http://widgeteffect.org/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Interdisciplinary Journal of Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
